patching...
Update: Have you signed up for the Windham Patch email newsletter? Get us in your inbox every morning or week by clicking here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Activists Furious After Contraception Vote [VIDEO]

NH House votes to allow employers to exempt contraception coverage based on religious objections.

 

A bill which would allow employers an exemption to pay for health insurance coverage for birth control if they have a religious objection was approved in the New Hampshire House by a vote of 196 to 150.

The vote was held on March 7, while hundreds of women’s health advocates gathered for hours at the Statehouse urging a "No" vote on a number of bills that they say will threaten the health, safety, and privacy of women.

About an hour before the vote, activists began to gather at the Statehouse for a rally.

Susan Arnold, the president of the board of NARAL Pro-Choice New Hampshire kicked off the rally saying she was excited to see so many people at the Statehouse, organized to talk to their representatives.

“This is outrageous,” she said. “We need to do something … today is our day.”

But the rally was abruptly stopped when advocates realized that a vote was coming up on HB 1546. The crowd quickly filed into the gallery and in the halls waiting for the vote. A number of parliamentary moves ensued, including requests for amendments and roll call votes.

Comments both for and against the bill seemed to come down political party lines.

State Rep. Andrew Manuse, R-Derry, rose in favor of the bill saying any law or mandate by the government require specific coverage like birth control was unconstitutional and was not about the choice of purchasing birth control.

“In the case of birth control or sterilization, an employee working for a religious organization may have to pay for these things out of pocket,” he said, adding that if birth control pills were prescribed for medical reasons, they would likely be covered.

State Rep. Stephen DeStefano, D-Bow, spoke against the bill and said that the recent sermon at Sacred Heart, the church he and his wife attend, was about hypocrisy and he found it telling after seeing what was going on in the House.

“We can’t wrap ourselves the Bible and religion when we need it,” he said. “If we’re going to wrap ourselves around it, when we need to wrap it all the time. This is not about religion. It’s about health insurance for everybody, on a community basis.”

After DeStefano spoke, cheers went up in the gallery prompting Speaker William O’Brien to call for order while threatening to clear the gallery if people weren’t quiet. Activists in the gallery then resorted to emoting their feelings through hand motions, a process often seen at Green Party and Occupy gatherings. When the activists were happy, they held their hands in the air and wiggled their fingers; at the end, after the vote, many stood up and silently held their thumbs down and hissed more.

In the hall, a number of people who were in the gallery began to make their way down the stairs while some of their counterparts held signs and yelled “Shame!” “We’ll remember in November” and “You’re the Taliban – we’re going to send you back to Afghanistan!” as representatives began to exit the hall.

The bill now goes to the state Senate. 

Related Topics: HB 1546, Jackie Cilley, Maggie Hassan, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, Statehouse, and contraception

Wendy James

5:00 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Shame on our House Reps and I hope you heard our voices loud and clear after this disgraceful vote! Double Shame on Rep Jenn Coffey for her ignorant, demeaning comments to women!

What I witnessed today was not democracy. There is a huge lack of common sense in Concord and some changes are in order.

I hope you hear me Mr Belanger, Mr Elliott, Mr Sytek, Ms Garcia, Mr Bettencourt ! Just one question, did you enjoy your free lunch in the cafeteria ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

salem activist

6:02 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Thank you Wendy for being there...we need more like you in Salem advocating for us!

Comment_arrow

Rusty

7:40 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Please watch your comments. You are implying that their votes were bought by a free lunch. This is not true and you should know that.

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

9:11 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Rusty, I think it's relevant to know who is being wined and dined during session.

Don Duston

5:15 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

I say if the Catholic Church wants to be granted exemptions for aspects of their health insurance coverage, that is fine, as long as they give up their tax exempt status to do so. Private businesses should be able to provide whatever benefits that it wants to its employees but a tax exempt business (yes, it is a business) should not be allowed to make such discriminatory decisions because the taxpayers have agreed to provide them with an exemption from paying their fair share to financially supporting their community.

Reply

Kim L Levasseur

5:16 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

I am so ashamed of our New Hampshire State Reps. who voted for this.

Reply

ForThePeople

5:38 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

I feel badly about this. The best we can do is to be there for New Hampshire's women in November and vote these people out.

Reply

salem activist

6:01 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Remember this in November! Along with the long list of other far right radical Bills passed by this group governing our State House...Vote them out!!!

Reply

John Deane

6:21 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

For medical neccessity...covered for good reason ("health" care). For choice contraception? Why...other than because it's something people don't feel like paying for anymore? Sorry, but they got this right. Nice to see a Democrat seeing the unconstitutionality too...

Reply

Rick

10:26 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

If women were in the majority in the NH House, all these anti-women bills would never get out of Committee. Women vote at a higher rate than men. NH Women need to remember in November. If they don't and either Smith or Lamontange become Governor, the sky will be the limit in 2013.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

6:55 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

How is this an anti-woman bill? Contraception is used by both genders. The bill does not ban contraception; it just ensures that religious organizations do not have to pay for something they oppose. Freedom of religion.

David Victory

11:41 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012

See? Republicans in Concord know what we worry about.

We wake up every morning to the nightmare that our insurance plans cover contraceptives. Thank goodness they did something about that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

6:54 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

Heck, even the president took time out from his laser like focus on jobs to be involved. A lousy economy is not a reason to supress freedom of religion...

Comment_arrow

David Victory

5:52 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

@ Seamus
"A lousy economy is not a reason to supress freedom of religion..."

The economy is improving all the time, and there's been no attempt whatsoever to suppress religion - it's a phony controversy stirred up by the corporate media. You fell for it.

The Shill

12:41 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

When more women get pregnant because they can't afford contraceptives don't complain when your tax dollars go to support them on welfare.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

6:52 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

The women in question are employed by religious organizations. They have a job and they can spend their own money on contraception. Or, they can get a job at another employer that has a health insurance plan they'd like better.

Wendy James

7:48 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

@Rusty: Don't tell me to watch my comments. It is a FACT that a Canadian Utility company lobbying for a project provided a free lunch for State Reps in the cafeteria of the State House. One Rep told me it was a lovely buffet and the cheesecake was to die for. In passing through I saw Rep Belanger sitting in the corner with Ms Griffin from Windham but I couldn't get his attention to ask about the cake.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty

8:18 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

It's not just the free lunch comment, it is the implication that their vote was bought because of it.

Comment_arrow

Wendy James

5:40 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Rusty: I am certain it was probably just goofing around, but one Rep did say leaving the cafeteria, "as long as you keep feeding me you'll have my vote".

My point really is that NO ONE SHOULD BE BUYING ANYONE LUNCH !!!

Edward Dunsel

8:05 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

This bill doesn't just apply to religious organizations. It's ANY employer who has objections.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Tony Schinella

8:07 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012

@Wendy: I don't know if a Canadian utility company ultimately ended up paying for the lunch but word around the Statehouse yesterday was that the Canadian consulate was inviting the reps down for lunch. An announcement was also made as such just before the break.

Reply

D.J. Bettencourt

12:05 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

Let's take this one step further. Both "Wendy James" and "Salem activist" have vented about the current legislature both here and at the Eagle Tribune. I offer this opportunity, please attend our Town Hall meeting on Saturday or call me personally on my cell phone: 603-247-2868 .I'm happy to answer any concerns or questions. I'm confident that if they believe strongly enough in their views, they will be more than comfortable making their case directly to me. I look forward to chatting with them

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don Duston

12:11 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

@RepBettencourt, so was your vote on this cotraception bill a make up call to the Catholic Church for your faux pas with the former Archbishop? Just wondering.

Comment_arrow

Wendy James

5:42 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

Just saw this. I posted a response under the ad for the meeting.

D.J. Bettencourt

12:52 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

Actually not at all, Don. I voted based on my convictions and principles. As the great Edmund Burke said, "Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion."

Please attend on Saturday or give me a call on my cell phone if you would like to discuss the issue in person. Given your strong views on the issue, I look forward to chatting with you. I hope to change your seemly cynical view that political leaders trade their votes for convenience over conviction. I hope you'll have the equal conviction to introduce yourself and chat with me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty

5:08 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

Well said Rep. Bettencourt. I have always wondered why people complained about issues that concerned them on public forums rather than directly to the person that might be able to explain. I applaud your efforts to come face to face with your opponents in public. At least you do not hide unlike some of your colleagues.

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

9:02 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

What is the point of the town hall exactly? Your legislature has been protested more than any other in my memory, with plenty of folks testifying, submitting depositions, phone calls, letters, and more. It has been met with a heavy hand, as you (collectively) have called the police to keep people out of the gallery and bullied your colleagues to get the votes you need. Instead of legislating for jobs, you (collectively) attack gay people, women, the sick and infirm, and give away our revenue base to the business.

So what is the town hall about, exactly? Are you trying to convince us that you are a good person or something? You haven't listened to us at all, and the quote that you just gave tells us you have no intention of listening to us because somehow you owe us your ill-advised judgment. By all means, tell us what your town hall is really about.

Comment_arrow

Wendy James

5:45 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

@Rusty: Hundreds of us took time off from work, arranged child care, and etc., so we could be in Concord early Wednesday morning.

There is no democracy taking place right now in Concord, and NO one is listening to their constituents as far as i'm concerned.

Who in New Hampshire asked for all these crazy bills ?

Stop Spending

5:38 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

If a woman wants contraception, it is her responsibility to pay for it herself.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Angie

4:45 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

In a perfect world, where rape did not exist, I might agree with you.

Comment_arrow

Mary

11:58 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

This is a good decision. If women want to prevent children and potentially harm their own bodies and possibly the genes of their future children by using them, it's their own decision, it shouldn't have to implicate others and damage their conscience and karma. You know, abstinence and self control are seriously underated in a world where it's easier to just pop a pill to fool Mother Nature, to fool your own sacred vessel, your body!It's like lying to yourself every day! How can "making love" even be considered as such then?

Angie, please don't tell me that you live your life every day taking contraceptives because of that frame of mind! Perhaps it's wiser for employers to pay for self-defense classes instead. I wish you all well, both in thought, body and spirit. :)

Comment_arrow

The Shill

5:38 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Abstinence does not work if it did there would not be a Christian Church. Mary was a virgin and still got pregnant. God was the original dead beat dad he impregnated mary then left another man to raise his child.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

5:54 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Only 42% of women who use birth control do so exclusively to prevent conception. So to hell with the other 58%?

Patriot

5:45 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

At one time people thought that welfare encouraged and aided in keeping minorities suppressed. During the discussion on one talk show the comments indicated the freedom to use contraception kept women in bed and men free from the responsibility of a families. How spin doctors work their wordsmith.

Reply

The Shill

9:29 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

If alter boys could get pregnant you would see the Catholic Church take a different stance on contraception.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Angie

4:35 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012

How true, how true...

Comment_arrow

Mary

12:09 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Just the open thought of this is as disgraceful as the act you are implying. This subject has nothing to do with what you've stated. The feminist movement that brought forth the reigning power of the birth control pill is what brought forth the detrimental side effects which reflect in today's women's and children's endocrine cancers. You are WOMEN, own up to it! If not for God's sake, at least for GOODNESS sake, for your own and for the children of the future!

D.J. Bettencourt

9:35 am on Friday, March 9, 2012

The point of our Town Hall meeting is to engage in a productive and healthy direct dialogue with constituents about the issues and challenges in Concord. If the goal is simply to vent about our disagreements or attack our political opponents then the protests and the poison pen “Letters to the Editor” are sufficient. I believe its time to move beyond yelling past each other and actually have a productive conversation about the issues facing New Hampshire and why we have taken the actions we have.

I’m not naïve enough to think that the outcome of this meeting will be that we will all walk out together, arm and arm singing kumbaya. However, it is my hope that while you may disagree with us you will have a greater appreciation for our thought process and appreciate that we have common goals and while we may have disagreements about the steps needed to achieve those goals we agree more often then we disagree.

Finally, it’s an opportunity for you to be able to look us in the eye and shake our hand. Despite the outrageous hyperbole in the media and elsewhere, we care deeply about New Hampshire and we are serving in Concord because we love our state and community. It certainly can’t be said that we do it for the money. I hope you will join us on Saturday.

Reply

Mary

1:00 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Feminism is good when it's about fighting for equal pay, equal intellectual growth and recognition, bringing about a healthy awareness, defending motherhood and the hard work that comes with it, and DEFENDING the health of women of all ages with a NATURAL defense. Fighting for birth control (hormonal especially) is demeaning! If women want to undermine themselves by succumbing to the false propaganda and brainwashing of the pharamceutical industries making money then they should have to be the one's to pay for their own demise. That or educate young women about their rights as WOMEN to remain women, give birth (if it is their choice to become parents), to live naturally, respect their bodies and Mother Nature, which, esentially is the SAME THING! Wake up people, we are supposed to be an evolved species yet we're fighting against everything we truly stand for! LIFE!

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

10:46 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

What do you mean by "evolved" species? If you are touting the bible, do you mind pointing out the passage describing evolution? Or are you only picking the pages that you like?

May I recommend "Religulous" by Bill Maher?

The Shill

5:58 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

When you have an organization known to harbor pedophiles you have to wonder what their motivation is to get people to have more children. The Catholic Church is one of the most morally bankrupt organizations in the world they need to get their own house in order before they start telling others what they should be doing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary

7:02 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Shill, the story of Mary and her Immaculate Conception is beautifully symbolic in the sense that she was pure of spirit, of mind and of intention and Jesus was a child conceived out of pure love. You're sitting there clearly, taking pleasure in your blasphemous ways and I hate to tell you, it isn't scoring you any spiritual points.

When you have a mass movement of women like yourself who are clearly only thinking of the cynicism, who are only thinking of your own desires in all of this and who only see the negative, it can't possibly be healthy on a level of collective awareness. You can't possibly believe that your distrurbing reasoning is the motivating factor to all of this, do you? I'm not saying that what has transpired in the past in the Catholic churches is ok, what I am saying is that this decision has nothing to do with that. Practice your sense of "strength" in proving to yourself at least that your health is important to you, that what is important amongst all of this is that women protect their bodies, to make priorities out of things more important than just thinking about how to prevent pregnancy so they can have sex galore without a thought. Condoms are also a very reliable option, wouldn't you agree? why opt for invasive contraception? Laziness, lack of self control? Victims of mental slavery to pharmaceutical endeavours? Are you just talkin' because you have nothing better to do?Who are you trying to defend and what is the moral of your opinion, really?

The Shill

8:34 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Mary I hate to tell you this but the Catholic church says that any form of conception including condoms are a sin. Where in the collection of myths that you call the Bible does it say that birth control is against any of the 613 Commandments in the Bible. the church justs make it up as they go along to control the masses and keep the flow of money comming in. Open your mind and think for yourself and don't let some man in a tall hat in rome brinwash you into thinking you will go to hell if you don't do what he says.

Reply

Leave a comment