patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Should 'ObamaCare' Be Repealed?

Friday marked the two-year anniversary of the legislation.

 

Friday marked the second anniversary of the health care reform law commonly referred to as "ObamaCare."

As you might expect, several New Hampshire GOP lawmakers, including Congressman Frank Guinta and Sen. Kelly Ayotte, issued statements criticizing the legislation. Guinta called it "one of the most flawed pieces of legislation ever passed by Congress," while Ayotte said "it's clear that massive government interference in the health care marketplace has failed."

New Hampshire Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley, meanwhile, praised the legislation, saying it has helped millions of people "receive quality, affordable health care."

What do you think? Do you agree with Guinta and Ayotte that the health care reform law should be repealed? Or do you think it's working fine and should be left alone? Vote in our poll below, and leave a comment with your thoughts.

  • Should health care reform be repealed?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        8107 (57%)
    • No
        5942 (42%)
    Total votes: 14049
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Health Care Reform and obamacare

jrmetalman

12:30 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

A friend of ours recently had a baby. Their family now has 3 little ones, 5 years old and younger. Each and every member of their family has a part in repaying our national debt. 50 thousand dollars each, means her families responsible for a quarter of a million in repayment. Every American citizen has to repay all the borrowed money. The affordable care act is expected to cost 2.6 TRILLION as of 2023, not 900 billion as the president said in the first ten years. Nothing "affordable" about Obamacare!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:32 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

And do you know how much my kids are going to pay for the War in Iraq, the Bush Tax Cuts, the Medicare RX bill, and all of the other corporate welfare that the republicans have given away for the last 30 years? Well...we're going to change all that by taking YOUR money now. And when we're done with that, we're going to sterilize all male republican right wing nuts so you can never breed again, and impopse your robbery agenda on the middle class workers ever again. Yep, we're bringing socialism to this nation, along with Communism, and the Nazi's, and all the other things your're soooo very very scared of. BE VERY AFRAID!!!! Boooooo!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:09 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

@ Jr

Got any sources to back up any of that gibberish?

Nope.

dee cocheran

1:10 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Obamacare is nothing more than pushing the USA towards socialism( communism) If Obama was interested in any health care reform he would concertrate on the escalating cost of health care.
Dee cocerha

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:33 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Another "duh"...it DOES address the escalating cost of health care...that was the whole point! duh!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:47 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Dee
So which is it, genius? Socialism or Communism? Why don't you just calm down, turn off FOX NEWS, and find out what the law really all about? http://www.newhealthcarelaw.com/

Comment_arrow

jjay

6:23 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

Jack24 & David Victory:
OB-care does NOT address escalating cost of health care. Read it!
I don't watch Fox News. I wonder, do YOU know the difference between socialism & communism? Or why Dee should have to choose which one Dee wishes to include in Dee's comment? Why don't YOU find out what the Obamacare is all about? I have. Now you do it.
Dee, I agree Obama was NOT interested in any health care reform. He was nudged (not pushed), he gave in, he copped-out for "dreg" (= crap) -- at the expense of the people and freedom. Please don't listen to these morons, who themselves are having trouble putting 2 & 2 together to come up w the sum for which they are hoping.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:39 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

@ jj

"I wonder, do YOU know the difference between socialism & communism? Or why Dee should have to choose which one Dee wishes to include in Dee's comment?"

Well, it can't be both at the same time, can it?

"Why don't YOU find out what the Obamacare is all about? I have. Now you do it."

It's about:

Children's Pre-Existing Conditions: Under the Affordable Care Act, health plans cannot limit or deny benefits or deny coverage for a child younger than age 19 simply because the child has a “pre-existing condition” — that is, a health problem that developed before the child applied to join the plan.

End to Limits on Care: In the past, some people with cancer or other chronic illnesses ran out of insurance coverage because their health care expenses reached a dollar limit imposed by their insurance company. Under the health care law, insurers can no longer impose lifetime dollar limits on essential health benefits and annual limits are being phased out by 2014. More than 105 million Americans no longer have lifetime limits thanks to the new law.

Curbing Insurance Cancellations: The Affordable Care Act stops health plans from retroactively canceling your insurance coverage solely because you or your employer made an honest mistake on your insurance application.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/healthreform#healthcare-menu

Comment_arrow

Nansaki

5:53 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Please get over the socialism nonsense...or do some responsible reading..tell me if you think Medicare and Social Security are socialistic....

Celia Brown

1:17 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

hmm, at almost 90% for repeal (at 1:10pm). Hey Ray Buckley, better start busing in the illegal aliens before Nov. elections. You think 90% puts NH as a swing state? Likely not with the current population in this state......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:34 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

hmmmm...SUGGEST YOU CHECK THAT NUMBER AGAIN as of 8:33 p.m.!!!!

Debra Woodward

3:35 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

The Affordable Care Act (1) is combating fraud and abuse, which in turns saves Americans a lot of money; (2) has brought coverage to 2.5 million young adults; (3) is delivering major savings to seniors on prescription drugs; (4) is giving a boost to small businesses through ACA tax credits; (5) has slowed the growth of Medicare spending; (6) has provided new treatment options for cancer patients; and (7) has offered new coverage protections for those with pre-existing conditions.These are tangible, real-world benefits, making a meaningful difference in people's lives.The right has invested an extraordinary amount of time, energy, and CASH into convincing the public that the reform law is a freedom-crushing disaster, hell bent on destroying Western Civilization. The p.r. offensive has taken its toll, and Americans who don't know much about the law's details have been misled -- there's ample data that shows the public loves what's in the Affordable Care Act, even if they think they oppose the law itself.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Celia Brown

4:52 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

(A) accelerating our nation debt to 15 trillion dollars. Expect acceleration to increase after 2014 (B) unwillingtaxes small business, expcially the one's your distiguished senator visited this week in NH - they have to pay additional taxes to stay in business (C) ultimately reduces competition by making my existing policy too expensive to keep. employers then pay the minimum penalty to kick me out of mine and force me to join Obamacare (D) This is simply redistribution of wealth and social re-engineering (E) Nov. election will be a referendum on Obamacare. everyone knows that.

Someone has to pay for all these freebies sweetheart. I'm doing my best legally to shield as much wealth as possible so I have the freedom to pay for the health insurance I want. that was possible before this crap-sandwich was shoved up everyone's ass

Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:51 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!! Finally, an INFORMED poster that did not buy all the misinformation spread around by the Republican LIARS.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:58 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Youcantfool

Your efforts are appreciated. Unfortunately there are imbeciles who think our current system is just fine. 50,000,000 uninsured Americans is ok with them. The majority of bankruptcies due to medical expenses is no problem in their opinion. An evil system that allows the insurance companies to rake in our cash, give their CEOs millions, and then pick and choose what procedures they will cover is great. Stupidity is timeless. Keep putting the truth out there.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:05 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Celia

"This is simply redistribution of wealth and social re-engineering"

That's what Rethuglicans have been doing for 30 years. Big, juicy tax cuts for billionaires and corporations - the shaft for the rest of us.

"Someone has to pay for all these freebies sweetheart."

Did you know the woman who is challenging the Affordable Care Act already went bankrupt from medical bills? http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/08/nation/la-na-healthcare-plaintiff-20120309

That's why we need "Obamacare", sweetheart.

Claudia cass

3:53 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I am delighted that we are finally spending money on Americans, right here at home. It had been an embarrassment to run all over the world telling others how to run their country, all while being the only developed country where access to healthcare is reserved for the healthy and the wealthy. In my lifetime, Obamacare will never cost as much as the wars bush entered into illegally!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Celia Brown

4:49 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Meanwhile those 'other' developed countries are moving away from socialized medicine because of the cost, corruption, and rationing. England is a good example of how they are moving back to a US - based plan. Canada as well.....

Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:53 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Wow, another INFORMED poster! We'll be paying for the Bush disasterS for the rest of time!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:09 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Claudia

Woman, you are SO right. Not only that, Obamacare heals people. War kills people. I'd rather fund the former.

Comment_arrow

Nansaki

5:59 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Celia...where on earth did you get this erroneous information. You must have missed (or avoided) Fareed Zacharia's excellent program about international health care compared with ours. It was on CNN a couple weeks.

ForThePeople

4:22 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Looks like the Paulbots were out in force for this one! Remember, it wasn't but 3 months ago where we had Ron Paul's poll numbers on here through the roof. Not only didn't he win a single state, he's been the loser throughout the entire race and will continue to be so. Patch poll numbers are routinely rigged.

The Affordable Care Act: I like it. It's about time we have a system that takes care of everyone irregardless of whether they are rich or not. Right now, we have a system where corporations own and control the majority of resources and can rig the system to stay on top while the rest of us fight for what remains. Some people call that capitalism. I think it's a plutocracy. This is something that is clearly for American citizens and not for corporations.

Routinely, people are asked whether or not they support The Affordable Care Act. The questions they are given ask if there should be pre-existing conditions, age coverages, content of the coverage, and so on, and most people support that. But when you say the word "Obamacare," all they hear is the propaganda blitz against it. You have people that go on the television, Fox news, Glenn Beck, and frankly the entire right wing, and without a shred of fact they just say over and over what a disaster it is. I think people should demand better of themselves and where they get their sources. Learn about this healthcare before you join the lemmings in denouncing it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Celia Brown

5:05 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Well as they say elections have consequences. And the Crap-Sandwich care act will weigh heavily on those who supported or were responsible for crafting it. It was true in the mid-terms. Add his big flub in Libya, the green tech disaster, class warfare, and legislation via fiat, it does not create a positive perception.

Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:57 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

YES!!! Another informed poster. This is uplifting to see for sure. People should always INFORM THEMSELVES, by researching the facts they hear in the media...its so easy to do today! Inform yourselves folks BEFORE you vote!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:14 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Celia

It's going to be a slaughter in November - and you won't be happy.

Go ahead and vote GOP; give them free rein over your uterus.

JimC

4:54 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Stop calling people stupid, FTP. To say that no one knows what's in it, and won't until it's fully in place smacks of Pelosi saying that they bill had to be passed into law before anyone would know what was in it. What kind of Democracy is THAT? This whole mess was jammed down our throats without even the Legislators understanding what was in it. Isn't THAT special!

Looks to me from this poll that 85% of We The People do NOT want the federal government telling us what we should buy, and want that fiscal disaster repealed.

You sound like Hillary's whine about the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy". I'm sure you're well aware that MOST broadcast stations lean left to far left, so whining about Fox is ridiculous and totally destroys your argument!

EIGHTY-FIVE PERCENT percent folks, read it and FACE IT! Stop wanting the government to take care of everything for you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:02 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I suggest YOU read again...its NOW 85 PERCENT that WANT IT! And thats at 9 p.m.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

1:39 am on Monday, March 26, 2012

Jim
Join the long list of the uninformed spreading the B.S. myth of "the liberal media".
90% of talk radio is conservative, 75% of guests on mainstream news shows are
conservative, and newspapers have been trending conservative for a long time.
That is aside from "Faux News" and CNN. [The very nature of the question "should Obama-Care be repealed?" is an example of right wing media bias. To be objective the question should have read "do you aprove or disaprove of the Affordable Care
Act?" This right wing bias is typical in other Patch polls as well.] You are either
uninformed or a liar.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYlyb1Bx9Ic

Celia Brown

5:07 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Will the 'Salem Activist' please remove Obama's residue from your chin. It's quite distracting

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:03 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Here we go...resort to school yard behavior.

Debra Woodward

6:28 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

The Affordable Care Act is a moderate reform package, designed by those who shaped Romney's Mass. law, and is entirely in line with what moderate Republicans endorsed in the Senate in the 1990s. There's no socialized medicine, and private insurers remain the backbone of the system. No reason for name-calling or getting hysterical just because you hate the President.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:05 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Very well put...but they can't seem to grip the FACTS, and when the facts show how they are misinforming people...they resort to name calling.

Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:31 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

And they will never say just why they hate the president...honestly anyway. But we all know why those Obama haters hate him.

Matt Publicover

7:52 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

The reason we have this law in the first place is because the majority of Americans have wanted changes to our health insurance system for years. It was no secret that a law of this sort would be on the agenda when Obama got elected. The reason it became controversial is Republicans decided to disavow their own health care reformideas that they had been making for years, since most of the former Republican plan is in this law. (All private insurance, NO government take-over, despite the oft-repeated lies.)

I think Republicans will be in for a rude awakening this fall when they find out that too many people are afraid of losing health care coverage under old system and do not want to go back. The right wing is a very loud, screaming minority.

If the Republicans decide to work with the administration instead of just saying no to everything, the law certainly could be tweaked in some meaningful ways. But it's not going away. Dream on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:07 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

very well put. I for one, am tired of going BACKWARDS in THIS country, while the rest of the world moves forward!

Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:38 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I find it AMAZING how many Republicans bash the hell out of Obama for the "mandate"...how many of you that do that, know that the mandate was ACTUALLY A REPUBLICAN AMENDMENT FROM THE 1990's healthcare debate! When Obama endorsed it, they turned around and hated THEIR OWN amendment!!! Do the research folks...look at the Congressional Records! Its all there. He's welcomed soooo many of THEIR ideas, and not just with healthcare...and when he does, they do the very same thing! They RUN as fast as they can from it, and tear apart their own ideas!

tyur reda

7:53 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I just moved to NH from Arizona, and I have to say...the right wingers in this state really scare me. I've never read so much dribble (words and sentences lacking in facts) and delivered with such vehemence...I look over my shoulder when I leave the house. How many of you twits have guns? I like NH for its greenery and mountains, but this right-wing fanatic drivel is truly scary....ACA addresses major deficiencies in American's health care system today, not the least of which is that 55 million people have no health coverage at all. And when they end up in the emergency room with stage 4 cancer, guess who pays the bill? Insurance companies in this country fritter away more than 30% of their premiums income on large CEO salaries and marketing. Good system? People with pre-existing conditions might as well just get it over with quick and DIE in this country. ACA addresses that too. I know these facts might be tough for NH's right-wing to digest, but they're facts. Now put away your guns and go get something to eat.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

8:25 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Yep, and it gets worse every year. they are not capable of thinking past their noses out of thier own selfish little worlds, let alone thinking about who really pays an E.R. bill when someone doesn't have insurance. Welcome, good luck...and yes they are gun toating, bible bangers...and this is a "stand your ground" law state!!!! DON'T WEAR A HOODIE in NH!!! Especially if you don't have insurance and can't pay an ER bill!

Comment_arrow

salem activist

11:41 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Very well stated..but with more voices like yours we can overcome these radical right wing nuts and start enjoying the beauty NH offers.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:19 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ tyur

Welcome! New Hampshire really is a beautiful state full of good people. Don't let the primitive righties who prowl Patch turn you off.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

10:52 am on Friday, April 6, 2012

If someone from ARIZONA [!!!!] is scared of the N.H. right wingers,
that just goes to show just how derailed the N.H. far right has become!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jan Schmidt

8:28 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Obamacare means never having to worry about getting sick and running up against a lifetime cap on insurance coverage. It gives parents the comfort of knowing their kids can stay on their insurance until they're 26, and that a "pre-existing condition" like an ear infection will never compromise their child's coverage.

It's about ending the practice of letting insurance companies charge women 50 percent more -- just because they're women.

And Obamacare can save seniors hundreds of dollars a year on prescription drugs -- and gives them access to preventive care that is saving their lives.

I LIKE Obamacare!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:42 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Yes...and one day too, they will like it. But perhaps not until THEY loose their health insurance, and find out just how expensive it is to go to the doctor WITHOUT health insurance. And when they live in constant pain, day after day, suffering, hour after hour, because they don't have enough money to pay the doctor...they will learn. Someday the shoe will be on the other foot, and they will know the SUFFERING of MILLIONS of Americans! Then and only then, will they be sorry.

buoy 1

8:41 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Good or bad one thing is for sure I am paying over double for healthcare since Obama went into office.Also may paycheck has gone down 30%,needless to say he will not have my vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:46 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I know lots of people whose healthcare has GONE DOWN the last 2 years, while their COVERAGE has gone UP! Also their paychecks have gone UP, not down. Lets keep one thing very clearly in mind...exactly what lead up to the Economic Meltdown of 2008...all that deregulation the republicans did over the years...how did all THAT work out for ya?!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:23 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ buoy

Yep. In some cases the insurance bastards actually RAISED their rates because Obamacare doesn't kick in fully until 2014. There are many good things about Obamacare that already benefit us. Learn more easily right here: http://www.newhealthcarelaw.com/

Mr Print

9:24 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Don't let the CRAZIES get in. Help the President Save the MIDDLE CLASS
Vote for OBAMA " yes we can again " Remember what it was like back in 2004 to 2008

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

2:35 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

I have NEVER forgotten, and NEVER will, all the crap that happened thru the ENTIRE BUSH YEARS!

Angela Warner

9:25 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

You are paying double for insur because if the ACA failed in any area, it's that it didn't do MORE to "tighten the screws" against these gigantic billion dollar insurance companies. The ACA has forced them to cover pre existing conditions and cover younger people who are not established enough in a career where they can afford to carry their own coverage premiums. (I've worked for a major medical provider in the billing dept for 11 yrs, so I can argue and teach people a few things about how the insur companies line the pockets of these right wing nut jobs who keep getting elected.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

9:35 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

I'm all ears Angela. Tell us.

Comment_arrow

Jack24

9:58 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Yes they do Angela...some people just refuse to see just how much Corporate America costs US ALL.

jrmetalman

9:26 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Two plus years of Obama madness and LIBERAL LEFT WING LUNATICS on parade have left me exhausted in so many ways. I am looking forward to anybody but Obama!!! Please repeat after me, ABO again ABO again ABO!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

10:01 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

more name calling. And note the repeating of ABO...their age old tactic...say it over and over and over again, and often enough...and they will believe it as the truth!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:26 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Jr

What "Obama madness" are you referring to? (I'm not expecting an answer, BTW. We know you can't provide one.)

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:27 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ News

"ABO". Clever. Don't strain yourself.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

1:02 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

News Flash
Do you copy and paste the "ABO" and then resubmit it dozens of times,
or do you type it by hand every time? I wouldn't want you to strain yourself
doing all those lengthy, deep, intellectual, and informative posts.

Terry Lochhead

9:58 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

ObamaCare is reducing the cost of prescriptions and providing free preventive screenings like mammograms and colonoscopies. ObamaCarw has also extended the financial solvency of Medicare. Repealing ObamaCare would be disastrous for seniors.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

10:06 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Unfortunately they don't seem to be capable of thinking that far ahead. Just in their OWN little worlds. Sad, very sad.

Comment_arrow

jrmetalman

10:39 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Providing free preventative screenings. Just who pays for all the free stuff anyway. You can't really believe anything of real value is free???

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:30 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Jr

"Just who pays for all the free stuff anyway."

WE DO! We pay insurance premiums, right? Then the damn HMOs can use the $$$ to provide CARE.

Jack24

10:25 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

See...say it enough and they will believe it as the truth. Their tactics never change.

Reply

Concerned Citizen

10:36 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Until the Senators and Congressmen are forced to have the same medical coverage as they have forced upon the public, I for one am going to remain leary of any medical package signed by them. If the majority of the rest of the world is looking at getting away from socialized medicine, why are we aiming towards it?

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

11:02 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Hey look, it's right-wing bigotry! I am so shocked.

I can't tell if you are asking a legitimate question, but here is the answer "concerned citizen."

1) you deal with socialism every day of your life. Public schools, public roads, hospitals, the military(Hey, don't the Republicans own this one? Hmm!), and more. This word has been adopted as a pejorative by the right wing, often flashing images of riots in Greece while saying the word socialism repeatedly to scare the crap out of you! "Government is bad" is a party line, it's not necessarily what happened to our civilization at all. Our nation rose to greatness with the help of great leadership. It certainly didn't magically happen from disparate tribes located around the country.

2) The European problem is located around the euro currency. If you take a look at Norway, which does have "socialized medicine," it's one of the best places in the world to live and not in crisis.

3) be concerned about any attempts by the right wing to blame the poor for crisis. After Wall Street took us for a ride, why is it we are now blaming the poor for healthcare? Who exactly should we be looking to reign in: cancer patients or white-collar scam artists and speculators?

Comment_arrow

Jack24

12:14 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

Concerned Citizen...we're moving towards a system they have had in Switzerland for YEARS. And its NOT a government healthcare system...its all PRIVATE INSURERS.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:35 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Concerned

You are uninformed. They do have the same coverage. You can bet your last dollar that they don't get yanked around by their insurance companies the way the rest of us do, though. So "the rest of the world is looking at getting away from socialized medicine"? Can you tell us more about that?

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:49 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ News

"Nothing is free"

No $h!t?

"In its Health at a Glance 2011 report, the OECD shows that the United States spent about $7,960 per person on healthcare in 2009 – approximately 2.5 times the average of the countries studied."

We pay a fortune for health insurance now - most of it rotten, with big co-pays, deductibles and "bridges". Those that can't afford it are forced to go without altogether. They seek medical attention in the emergency room after a condition that could have been treated early has become a crisis. If they can't afford the big bills they go bankrupt - and the rest of us absorb the cost anyway. Know who laughs all the way to the bank?

Cigna CEO H. Edward Hanway earned annual compensation of $17 million, and exercised stock options worth just under $1 million.

Humana CEO Michael McCallister earned $3.1 million, with exercised stock options worth more than $11 million.

Aetna CEO Ronald Williams earned $8.17 million, and exercised stock options worth more than $5.4 million.

WellPoint CEO Angela Braly earned $9.1 million and exercised stock options worth more than $1 million.
http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/on-call/2010/08/20/focusing-on-health-costs-a-close-up-look-at-health-ceo-salaries/

Know who enables them? You.

Debra Woodward

11:03 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

More FACTS. The Affordable Care Act ends the worst of insurance companies abuses such as denying coverage because of a pre-existing condition. The act provides 86 million Americans with free preventive care while ending lifetime limits on your coverage. It bans insurance companies from dropping coverage due to errors based on unintentional mistakes in their paperwork. The act makes sure that your premium dollars are spent on care, not profits for insurance companies. Insurance companies will now be required to spend 85 percent of your premium dollars on health care, not administrative cost and profits.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tonto

11:05 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Yea, and i'm the tooth fairy :)

Comment_arrow

Jack24

12:20 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

Who out there DOESN'T support all these things? Tell me...do people actually love their healthcare insurance companies, so much that they are willing to continue their abusive practices? If people would only try to read the facts of what the bill actually does, they would be far less likely to be against it. How many out there that oppose the healthcare act, have actually read the bill?

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:57 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Tonto

"Yea, and i'm the tooth fairy :)"

Don't believe it? Why don't you find out? Burn a few calories looking for information that isn't on FOX, Newsmax, drudge, etc. Pretend you're an investigative journalist and need to get the facts.

jrmetalman

11:30 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Wall Street wasn't alone taking us for a ride. Liberal politics that said all people must be treated equally in mortgage applications. Mortgages were given so often to people who couldn't make the payments. When the prices began to fall the game was over. Not Bushes fault as you idiots have said a KABILLION times. Liberal practices in the mortgage industry killed the housing market!!! Everything fell apart after that. It started with Clinton and Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack24

12:25 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

AND ALL THE REPUBLICANS THAT CONTROLLED THE CONGRESS IN THE 90'S AND AGAIN UNDER BUSH THAT DID ALL THAT DEREGULATION OF THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They just refuse to see just WHO was behind the deregulation that ALLOWED all that to happen!!!!!

Comment_arrow

David Victory

2:55 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

@ Jr

"Liberal politics that said all people must be treated equally in mortgage applications."

That's crap. "Liberals" never said banks should hand mortgages to people unable to make payments. If you have proof of that, provide it. Glen Beck's blackboard hasn't done you any favors.

rick barasso

8:30 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

I read something the other day I thought made an interesting point.
Why do we never hear the teaparty or GOP refer to social security as FDRSECURITY or Medicare as LBJCARE? Putting these things into perspective,
I wish the Dems would tout Obamacare with the same pride. I think part of the fear some have of "Obamacare" is because, some on the left have seemed timid when it is brought up. Not because it is wrong, but because they are afraid that the right will throw it's misinformation machine at them come election time.
Yesterday, I had an "older" man tell me all the reasons why he hated and was afraid of Obama. Out of respect for his age and not wanting to give him a stroke, I let him roll. Laughing inside, as EVERY reason he gave was untrue!

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

10:30 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

Interestingly enough, without that misinformation machine you speak of, this would be an easy election. The facts support this presidency and the affordable care act. Only fear and loathing can stop it.

Debra Woodward

9:04 am on Sunday, March 25, 2012

From a veteran: "I understand that the GOP has concerns about the law. Veterans have concerns too – like the concern that many who have seen Veterans Affairs care expire cannot afford health insurance; like the concern that many more coming home in a tough economy may find it difficult to find a job and/or afford insurance; and like the concern that according to a report from Harvard, an estimated 2,266 veterans died in 2008 because they had no health insurance.
It’s for those veterans that this new law means so much. To repeal it would mean that unemployed veterans – the rate of which is 8.3 percent, and 21 percent among the youngest Iraq and Afghanistan veterans – will lose the access to health care that this law provides. To repeal it would mean a whole new generation of veterans will come home to struggle to make ends meet, while paying skyrocketing health insurance premiums to unchecked insurance companies."

Reply

Debra Woodward

7:14 am on Monday, March 26, 2012

Republican presidential candidates and third-party political groups supporting Republican candidates have been the largest spenders in anti-health-care law ads since July, 2011. In particular, former Mass. governor Mitt Romney's campaign spent nearly $1.4 million in broadcast media against the health care bill; The Red White and Blue Fund, the super PAC supporting Rick Santorum, spent $1.7 million; And Karl Rove's pro-Republican super PAC, Crossroads GPS, invested $2.8 million for critical ads.
Several poll results have shown that viewers of FOX news are the least informed about current events and scientific truths  In fact, results showed they were even less informed than those who say they don’t watch any news at all. The “Fox News Effect” has been widely studied through previous polls and reports. This misinformation means that they are more likely to support a right-wing, conservative political agenda.

Reply

salem mom

8:53 am on Monday, March 26, 2012

youcantfoolmothernature - that is fascinating. I'd love to read more about the problems with Fox News. Can you please post some links to the polls you refer to?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

12:24 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

salem mom,

They all lie -- per LJoel Hackbart link: www.alternet.org

"By the way, the rest of the media was not blameless. CNN and the broadcast network news operations fared only slightly better in many cases. Even MSNBC, which had the best record of accurately informing viewers, has a ways to go before it can brag about it."

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

1:45 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

Hilltopper,
That is true. Other news operations are not blameless. They also have a
corporate media slant. Even MSNBC will fire talk show hosts if they they
don't walk the line and go too far to the left.[Keith Olbermann,Cenk Uygur, Phil Donahue] I hope I don't have to tell you they pale in comparison to "Faux News" however.

JK

1:18 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

always love the side of the argument that uses youtube links to get a point out there.

Reply

Big Ben

2:15 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

All news media these days are programming for specific audiences and in direct reaction to other networks. Their left or right lean or disregard for the facts is a business decision. The most troubling aspect is media has been in a deep depression since 2006. Staff reductions are almost to the point where you only have a pretty model reading you stuff off the Internet. Whoops, I gave away their secret. (or you get AOL putting up bare bones sites in every city with one guy running it from home, asking locals to entertain, and calling it parch:-)

Reply

Bob Gibbs

7:51 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

People in favor of Obamacare say that everyone will pay their fair share into the system. My question to you is, how much does someone not working pay? Any takers?

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

10:04 pm on Monday, March 26, 2012

They would pay about the same the church does in taxes.

Comment_arrow

David Victory

1:02 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

@ Bob,

It would be subsidized. How would you, Bob, pay for health insurance without an income? If you were out of work, wouldn't you be grateful that, at the very least, wouldn't lose your insurance?

Crash

7:55 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

This health plan does nothing to solve any of the problems other than those that don't have insurance. Does it curb the costs of all the illegals crowding the ER's and using them as general doctor offices? All those costs increae the hospital costs that need to get pushed somewhere. They get tossed to insurance companies and to the consumers that pay their bills. As a CPA i sat through an entire day of seminars about the impact this bill would have on our clients so that we can inform them of their choices. "The choice to keep what you have" is a pile of lies. Yes you can keep that, however that's if your company still offers it after the rate skyrocket in order to force everyone to opt for the gov't subsidized plans due to excessive costs from the private plans. For example Company A has an insurance plan that is offered to all employees. The cost of the plan is $5000 a year. Let's say the company covers half of that so the initial cost to the employee was 2500. Well if the gov't plan is $3000 the employee can chose that plan instead and the company needs to cover that by providing the employee with a check for the plan, not the govt plan, for theirs. So the employee walks away with a check for 5k, pays 3k for the gov't plan and keeps the difference. So how is that benficial to the employer. Hmm must of missed that somewhere between the lines.

Reply

Crash

7:56 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Massachusetts plan is an utter failure. Since everyone is now walking around with shiny health cards do they go to all the nice shiny new neighborhood clinics that were set up to accomodate everyday medical needs. Nope. They go to places like MGH cause they have a cramp in their foot or they are having sleep problems. SO by instituting the state plan the costs have gone way out of control (I don't have the slides in front of me to quote firgures). How about we try to solve the problems. Educating those less fortunate about proper nutrition, exercise, smoking, etc. The gov't shoudl entice businesses to offer gym discounts, and stop smoking programs to create a healthier population vs. forcing them to provide healthcare to people that don't care for themselves. Should their be an option for those that want helathcare and can't afford it yes. This isn't the way to do it. I work hard for my money and i shouldn't have to pay for people that refuse to care for themselves. If you want to smoke or eat yourself to death that's your choice.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

11:46 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Chrystal,
First, let me give you a tad bit of praise before I blast you too much.
Unlike the majority of right wing crazies that polute these pages with
silly one sentence junk soundbites, you offer a substantive, complete
and polished looking argument, and that is a refreshing change.
That said, I cannot disagree more with your comments and conclusions.
The Massachusetts health care law is unquestionably not a failure.
98% of the State's people are now covered and cost containment figures
seem to differ greatly with your claims.
As for the national "Affordable Care Act" cost containment measures are
to be enacted to prevent insurance company abuses. Apparently,without
realising it, you are making a great case in FAVOR OF the preventive care
measures in the A.C.A. [ You also should be a big Michelle Obama supporter who
is promoting diet and fitness on a grand scale and has been nothing but demonized
by your fellow conservatives} I should also point out you pay far more in total
costs for other unheathy people in the current system than you will when the
A.F.C. is fully enacted.
www.americanprogress.org/events/2011/04/masshealth.html

Comment_arrow

Jack24

2:59 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

CHRYSTal: Should I pay for the drug addict, the drunk, the nut that jumps off a bridge bungie jumping, the person that skydives, the person that surfs with sharks, the person that wants to have unprotected sex, the person that likes to play with fireworks, the person that wants to skateboard off of roofs, the person that doesn't wear a seatbelt, the person that doesn't keep a proper sleep schedule--ALL of which have been known to cause sickness and injury...WHAT IS THE CUT OFF POINT FOR "LIFESTYLE REGULATION?"

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

8:57 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Should I also pay for other people's kids to go to school? I pay to the tune of thousands of dollars for public education, and I don't have any kids. If you want to go to a tribal system, let's just call it what it is. Or you can accept that society has certain illnesses and certain costs, and we have decided to go collectively to a better future.

Comment_arrow

Crash

9:32 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

The problem lies in the irresponsibility of too many people and too many handouts being provided with no recourse so lets just let everyone get a free ride for everything and be accountable to no one for anything. Doing what I do i see so much waste I cringe. I also see way too many people abusing the system. If they would make all the people receiving all the "free" services have some sort of a tax impact maybe i would be fine with also having to provide them with healthcare. Watching people soak of the system and claim poverty and get tax dollars back every year burns me. I see people receiving section 8 housing, free childcare, food stamps, free healthcare for their children and then because they have low W2 they they get an EIC. And of course the father of the children is illegally living with her and was able to scam his way onto permanet disability. If the value of all those things were added to the persons wages they are making more than me, which is why we commonly see so many "poverty" stricken people dressed to the nines driving aronud in their escalades and navigators. So when they tighten those reigns let's talk. If i wanted to live in a society of handouts i would move to Lawrence.

Comment_arrow

Crash

10:01 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

Jack24:

Do I think we should cover drug addicts and alcoholics. Nope. I believe in the natural selection process. if you want to waste your life and be a burn out then do it and let your demons kill you and we naturally weed out those that don't belong. all the drug dealers and addicts would be taken care of and maybe the eyes of the "maybe" people will open. I shouldn't have to be ID'd to buy Claritin for my congestion and then be limited to one purchase at a time. If they want to make meth then let them. We shouldn't constantly be restricting the majority's freedoms because a minority can't make a wise choice. I don't want you to construe that to say that i think that all uninsured are theses people. Two separate gripes. Does go hand in hand with my "gov't assistance" gripe below.I believe that insurance companies have issues, but just the same the physicians offices are just as corrupt in certain cases. There are definitely problems, i just don't see this as being the solution especially at the price.

Kate Lockhert

5:42 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

What I'm looking for is a way to bring down health insurance rates. They're killer for small business (which is most of what he have in NH.) My family has paid almost $250,000 in monthly insurance payments in the past decade. And I've been told by competing insurance companies that's a deal. No matter who wins the White House or controls Congress, they'll have to address this *effectively* and soon!

Reply

LJoel Hackbart

1:56 am on Friday, March 30, 2012

Kate
The Affordable Care Act, while certainly better than nothing is still a compromise
with the insurance industry, and the cost controls in that plan, which will offer
group plans to small businesses and proprietors, have yet to be enacted.
Countries with single payer systems offer better coverage at about half the cost
of our out of control privately run heatlh care system. Imagine the boon for small businesses without those costs burdening you.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxi7DnCH3zk
www.healthcare-now.org/whats-single-payer
www.healthcare-now.org
www.pnhp.org/news/2006/september/study_singlepayer_.php -
www.greenhouseonline.org/Single_Payer-I.html

Reply

Truth B. Told

1:49 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

57% in New Hampshire say should be repealed.
42% say no.

Reply

News Flash

1:53 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

Ambiguity in Health Law Could Make Family Coverage Too Costly for Many

Obama and democrats neglected to tell the truth. LYING.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/us/ambiguity-in-health-law-could-make-family-coverage-too-costly.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

Reply

News Flash

6:07 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Obamacare’s unpopularity blunts Obama’s attacks on Romney-Ryan Medicare plans

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/08/18/2956860/obamacares-unpopularity-blunts.html

Reply

News Flash

10:21 pm on Monday, August 20, 2012

Ryan Wants to Save Medicare for Mom, Grandma

http://www.cnbc.com/id/48712407

ObamaCare must be repealed to save Mom and Grandma

Reply

News Flash

12:49 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Obamacare Is Even More Unpopular Now than in 2010
1:05 PM, Oct 29, 2012
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obamacare-even-more-unpopular-now-2010_658093.html

One week before the election that will likely determine Obamacare’s fate, Americans support its repeal by an even wider margin than they did in the immediate aftermath of its highly unpopular passage.

According to newly released polling from Rasmussen Reports, by a margin of 15 percentage points (54 to 39 percent), likely voters now support the repeal of President Obama’s centerpiece legislation. In the first three polls taken in the wake of the House’s passage of Obamacare (on March 21, 2010), Rasmussen showed that likely voters then favored repeal by margins of 13 points (55 to 42 percent), 12 points (54 to 42 percent), and 12 points (54 to 42 percent). Cementing Obamacare would be the principal focus of Obama’s second term.

Reply

Leave a comment